Followers
Friday, December 21, 2012
EDLD 5363 Web Conference Reflection
Web Conference 12-8, 12-16, 12-17
The web conference on 12-8 was very informative about the different ways groups were communicating. Some forms used were Drop box, email and Google docs. Although I do not usually ask many questions listening to others and reading their questions is a great way for me to process what needs to be done.
The web conference on 12-16 was used to discuss final days of project. Dr.Abernathy explained that we were not to have submitted anything for week 4 all was to be submitted in week 5. She also explained that there was to be no still pictures in your videos. We discussed making sure that we had one script for our video. She stated that all was due on the 21st because IA's had to get their grades in by Monday, but if we needed extra time to let her know because she could still grade our project. This put my mind at ease somewhat.
The web conference on 12-17 was used to discuss the final countdown. Dr.Abernathy clarified any questions that anyone had concerning the project. she discussed what our next class would be when we return in January. She double checked to make sure we had a field supervisor and discussed our updates on our final assignment for week 5.
Although I truly enjoyed making the video , this was a very challenging class for me. I am thankful for my great group and look forward to working with them again.
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Week 5 Reflection
As I
began this course, I was not sure as to what educational research
entailed. I did not realize the depth
and steps involved in action research planning.
Choosing a topic to research was a small change. I was not sure which avenue I wanted to
explore. Researching the use of
technology in some type of setting was what I kept being drawn back to. Time
and time again I see students struggling to comprehend what they have read.
This is what led me to the Action Research plan that I have in place. In the
end, my passion for the students that struggle in school won out.
As I
completed each week’s assignment, there were moments in which I felt the
lessons were redundant. Looking back, I
can see how it reinforced all of the steps and thought processes needed to fine
tune a well-crafted research plan. Each
week allowed me to focus on the plan as a whole, and also break down the steps
and concentrate on the small pieces.
I
thoroughly enjoyed reading other ideas and research plans on the discussion
board and on student blogs. There are so
many great ideas, and I definitely will be following my colleagues’
research. I am looking forward to seeing
results, and using the knowledge learned from my colleagues’ research in my
classroom.
The
reading material was very useful during this course. I loved having the templates and tools that
were provided. They not only helped with
weekly assignments, but will also assist me during future steps in the research
process. I will be referring back to
these resources while conducting my action research plan and will use during
other projects/research as well.
I
think one of the most informative lectures of this course were the videos of
leaders discussing action research. Listening to them describe the process, the
steps involved, and important things to remember brought the importance of
action research. They are great leaders because of their dedication to finding
the answers to the issues. This means
that they must examine very detailed, concise information, and not make quick
judgments and decisions that are not supported by research.
I
have increased my ability to produce a data driven, research based plan after
completing this course. It has also
given me confidence to consider other action research plans, and to appreciate
the thought process and time involved in making decisions. Action research is a process that is
necessary in making the choices in education.
It can also provide data that will change the entire direction of your
plan. I’m looking forward to developing
my action research plan, conducting research, collecting data, and finalizing
the results.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
A Few Revisions
|
Action Research Plan
|
|||||||
|
Goal: To provide first grade students of
low socioeconomic status the skills- tools needed to improve comprehension
including but not limited to technology.
|
|||||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|||
|
Brandi Murrey
Angelee Morales
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
|
|
|||
|
2. Obtain previous DRA test.
|
Brandi Murrey
Previous Teacher
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Previous teacher documentation in student’s
cumulative file.
Kinder Teacher
|
Use the information to determine struggles
with comprehension.
|
|||
|
3. Determine student’s level of vocabulary.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
Small group setting using sight word
activities.
|
Enhance vocabulary use and the student’s
ability to deliver what they learned from the story.
|
|||
|
4.
Obtain knowledge of student’s phonological awareness.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Small Group
Computer
|
Enhance student’s phonological awareness to
allow them to read more fluently.
Reading programs on the computer that
monitor progress.
|
|||
|
Action Planning
Template
|
||||
|
Goal: To provide first grade students of
low socioeconomic status the skills- tools needed to improve comprehension
including but not limited to technology.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
5. Determine if student has any short or
long time memory deficiencies.
|
Brandi Murrey
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Skills to increase short and long term
memory.
Mimio
|
Retelling of information read, sequence
activities or putting to use what was read.
Activities for MImio that increase
comprehehnsion.
|
|
6. Evaluate the outcome of reading
instruction.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
Small Group
DRA leveled readers.
Stories on Ipods
|
Evaluate using rubrics, test, sequence
activities or retelling.
|
|
7.
Obtain DRA scores and story test every two weeks.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Small Group
Leveled Readers
|
Compare current DRA data with beginning DRA
data to determine growth.
|
|
8. Compile all data into the Action
Research Plan and present an informal presentation.
|
Brandi Murrey
Angelee Morales
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
Baseline Data
Midyear Data
End of Year Data
|
Using all data collected to determine if
skills taught helped low se students improve comprehension.
|
Format based on Tool 7.1 from Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and
Combs, 2010)
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Week 3
I am very excited to have a plan in place. I am looking froward to getting back to school so that I may begin my research.
Revision- Action Research Plan
|
Action Research Plan
|
|||||||
|
Goal: To provide students of low
socioeconomic status the skills- tools needed to improve comprehension
including but not limited to technology.
|
|||||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|||
|
Brandi Murrey
Angelee Morales
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
|
|
|||
|
2. Obtain previous DRA test.
|
Brandi Murrey
Previous Teacher
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Previous teacher documentation in student’s
cumulative file.
|
Use the information to determine struggles
with comprehension.
|
|||
|
3. Determine student’s level of vocabulary.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
Small group setting using sight word
activities.
|
Enhance vocabulary use and the students
ability to deliver what they learned
from the story.
|
|||
|
4.
Obtain knowledge of student’s phonological awareness.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Small group setting and computer.
|
Enhance students phonological awareness to
allow them to read more fluently.
|
|||
|
Action Planning
Template
|
||||
|
Goal: To provide students of low
socioeconomic status the skills- tools needed to improve comprehension
including but not limited to technology.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
5. Determine if student has any short or
long time memory deficiencies.
|
Brandi Murrey
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Skills to increase short and long term
memory. Mimio activities .
|
Retelling of information read, sequence
activities or putting to use what was read.
|
|
6. Evaluate the outcome of reading
instruction.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
Small group DRA leveled readers.
Stories on Ipods
|
Evaluate using rubrics, test, sequence
activities or retelling.
|
|
7.
Obtain DRA scores and story test every two weeks.
|
Brandi Murrey
Student
|
August 2012- May 2013
|
Small Group
Leveled Readers
|
Compare current DRA data with beginning DRA
data to determine growth.
|
|
8. Compile all data into the Action
Research Plan and present an informal presentation.
|
Brandi Murrey
Angelee Morales
|
August 2012-May 2013
|
Baseline Data
Midyear Data
End of Year Data
|
Using all data collected to determine if
skills taught helped low se students improve comprehension.
|
Format based on Tool 7.1 from Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and
Combs, 2010)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)